Selecting an optimal SiC polytype for specific applications is essential to optimizing electrical, thermal, and mechanical performance. Impurities like Li and group VA or VIA create half occupied a1 energy levels close to CBM while B, N or P induce lattice expansion.
4H- and 6H-SiC have cubic and hexagonal bonds with stacking sequences of ABCB, creating hexagonal symmetry (wurtzite).
What is 4H SiC?
Silicon carbide comes in many different crystal structures – known as polytypes – with each having different physical and electrical properties that make them suitable for certain semiconductor applications. Four highly popular polytypes are 4H SiC and 6H-SiC; differences among them arise largely from variations in crystal structures that influence electrical and thermal characteristics.
Crystal structures determine their properties and are generally represented by three-dimensional tetrahedron (A, B, C) lattices. A specific crystal can be identified based on its stacking sequence of bilayers forming its lattice as well as symmetry; depending on these criteria, its lattices may either have cubic or hexagonal symmetry depending on stacking sequence. Cubic crystal structures have three bilayer periodicity and are designated 3C-SiC; hexagonal crystalline structures have six bilayer periodicity which denote 6H-SiC; while rhombohedral bonding leads to ten bilayer tetrahedron structures with 15R-SiC denotations.
4H-SiC’s wide bandgap makes it suitable for efficient operation in environments of elevated temperatures and voltages, making it the go-to material for high-power electronics like power switches. Furthermore, its high breakdown strength ensures stable performance under stress while its superior thermal conductivity allows effective heat dissipation – all qualities which make 4H-SiC an excellent choice for applications requiring robust performance under extreme environmental conditions such as aerospace electronics requiring robust operation in harsh conditions.
What are the main differences between 4H SiC and 6H-SiC?
As silicon carbide wafers continue to play an integral part in the creation of advanced electronics, it is critical for manufacturers to select the appropriate polytype. Selecting the most effective wafer means improving performance, efficiency and longevity in semiconductor devices – it is therefore vital that manufacturers understand structural differences between 4H SiC and 6H-SiC to select an optimum wafer that best meets their requirements.
The two SiC crystal structures differ significantly in terms of their atomic bonds and overall symmetry of the crystal structure, with 4H-SiC featuring cubic bonds with bilayer stacking sequences ABCB while 6H-SiC features wurtzite bonds of ABABB BAB ABA (see Figure 2089a). Both polytypes possess both cubic and wurtzite bonding; other non-cubic SiC polytypes such as 3C-SiC and 15R-SiC use only wurtzite bonding (see Figure 2089a).
6H-SiC’s wide bandgap characteristic and high breakdown voltage make it the ideal material for power devices operating at elevated temperatures and frequencies, as its superior thermal conductivity, which is three times that of traditional silicon, facilitates efficient heat dissipation – another key factor in device reliability and efficiency. Furthermore, 4H-SiC stands out for its crystal structure and physical properties which make it suitable for high temperature sensors as well as devices prone to stress such as power switches or aerospace electronics.
What are the advantages of 4H SiC?
4H SiC’s exceptional mechanical strength and hardness — providing it with unparalleled resilience against harsh environments — make it an invaluable choice for power electronics, including switches and diodes. Its high breakdown electric field strength and excellent saturation electron velocity enables efficient operation at elevated temperatures, voltages, and currents; its exceptional thermal conductivity facilitates effective heat dissipation to maintain device integrity under high power operations.
SiC’s high refraction index allows for tight light confinement and superior performance in applications like optical amplifiers and ring resonators, with its high second-order nonlinear refractive index providing the material an ideal surface for wavelength conversion through four-wave mixing.
Wide band gaps provide negligible junction leakage currents, reducing overall operating temperature of the device and allowing more power to be delivered with reduced heat loss. Furthermore, their high breakdown electric field strength results in smaller drift layers for a given blocking voltage; significantly lowering switching losses.
Hemocompatibility is another key attribute of SiC, as it allows it to interact seamlessly with blood plasma surrounding our brains and other organ systems. This compatibility allows implantable biodevices like neural implants and in-vivo sensing and control solutions for future medicine to take advantage of this compatibility. Recent hemocompatibility studies have demonstrated both 6H- and 4H-SiC exhibit low thrombotic reactivity with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), making them perfect candidates for medical applications.
What are the disadvantages of 4H SiC?
4H-SiC’s wide bandgap (3.2eV), combined with its high breakdown voltage and low defect density, makes it an excellent material for power electronics applications such as high-performance switches and diodes that operate at elevated temperatures – ideal for applications such as electric vehicles and renewable energy systems that demand reliable performance under stress. Furthermore, its three times greater thermal conductivity provides exceptional heat dissipation that ensures device integrity and longevity.
4H-SiC offers many advantages over silicon for MEMS applications, including electronic, chemical, and mechanical properties that make it suitable for pressure sensors, accelerometers, mechanical resonators and gyroscopes. Furthermore, its fracture toughness surpasses that of silicon, creating reliable devices in harsh environments.
SiC is used in PIC applications despite its poor substrate quality and process technology, particularly for waveguide synthesis – one key building block of high-performance photonic devices – due to point defects which cause significant losses and reduce device performance. However, it is possible to reduce these point defects by improving epitaxial layer surface chemistry and optimizing growth conditions; controlling defect distribution through doping controls as well as applying controlled doping technologies can all help mitigate such shortcomings.
English 
Swedish